From Recognition to Protection: How Indian Law Safeguards Transgender Rights
Oct 7
3 min read
0
0
Transgender persons have long faced social exclusion and legal invisibility. Over the past decade, India’s legal framework has undergone a significant transformation from denying recognition to affirming the right of every person to live with dignity, irrespective of gender identity.
Constitutional and Human Rights Foundation
Even before a specific statute existed, the Constitution of India guaranteed protection to transgender persons through its fundamental rights:
Right to Equality (Article 14): Everyone is equal before the law and entitled to equal protection of laws. The term “person” includes transgender individuals, ensuring protection from discrimination by the State.
Right against Discrimination (Articles 15 & 16): The Supreme Court in NALSA v. Union of India (2014) held that “sex” includes “gender identity,” prohibiting discrimination based on gender expression or identity in employment, education, or other spheres.
Right to Life and Dignity (Article 21): This includes the right to privacy, bodily autonomy, and self-identification of gender essential to living a life of dignity.
Freedom of Expression (Article 19): Protects an individual’s right to express their gender identity through clothing, behaviour, or lifestyle.
Internationally, the Yogyakarta Principles and UN Human Rights Council resolutions affirm the global obligation to protect individuals from discrimination on grounds of gender identity.
Recognition of Gender Identity
The NALSA Judgment (2014) recognized transgender persons as a “third gender” and affirmed their right to self-identification, declaring that gender identity is integral to personal autonomy.
Following this, Parliament enacted the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 which provides that:
Every transgender person has the right to be recognized as such and to obtain a Certificate of Identity from the District Magistrate.
Upon obtaining this certificate, a person can change their name and gender in official documents.
For a change to male or female, proof of surgery is required under the Rules, a provision criticized for being inconsistent with the principle of self-identification upheld in NALSA.
Statutory Safeguards and Penalties
Section 18 of the Act criminalizes:
Compelling a transgender person into bonded labour or begging,
Denial of access to public spaces,
Physical, sexual, or verbal abuse.
Punishment ranges from six months to two years imprisonment, with fine.However, the relatively mild penalties compared to similar offences under the IPC have been widely criticized as discriminatory.
Important Judicial Decisions
NALSA v. Union of India (2014): Recognized “third gender” status and constitutional right to self-identify gender.
Arun Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration (Madras HC, 2019): Held that a trans woman qualifies as a “bride” under the Hindu Marriage Act, upholding validity of her marriage.
Chinmayee Jena v. State of Odisha (2020): Recognised right of transgender persons to cohabit with partners of their choice.
Vyjayanti Vasanta Mogli v. State of Telangana (2023): Struck down the colonial “Telangana Eunuchs Act” and directed welfare inclusion of transgender persons.
Institutional and Welfare Measures
National Council for Transgender Persons (2020): Advises the Government on policy, monitors implementation of the Act, and ensures inter-ministerial coordination.
Welfare Schemes: Many States (e.g. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Delhi) have schemes for housing, healthcare, and skill development.
Reservation: The NALSA judgment directed governments to treat transgender persons as socially and educationally backward for purposes of reservation though nationwide implementation remains pending.
Key Gaps and Needed Reforms
Despite progress, several challenges persist:
Screening committees for gender identity certificates violate the principle of self-identification.
Lower penalties for offences against transgender persons must be harmonized with general criminal laws.
Marriage, adoption, and inheritance laws still largely exclude recognition of transgender couples or parents.
Need for stronger enforcement and awareness among officials and employers.
Conclusion
Legal recognition has laid the foundation for dignity, but equality is realized only when laws are implemented with empathy and respect. Transgender persons in India today stand on firm constitutional ground yet social and institutional transformation must follow. The law must evolve from mere recognition to full inclusion where identity is not just acknowledged, but celebrated.
